Michael Cohen (Pic Via Twitter)
In a significant development in Donald Trump’s first criminal trial, Michael Cohen’s credibility was called into question.
Cohen, a former ally turned adversary, faced intense cross-examination by Trump’s attorney, Todd Blanche.
The focus was on Cohen’s previous statements regarding a call about Trump’s hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.
Under scrutiny, Michael Cohen admitted that the call initially concerned a different matter, casting doubt on his earlier testimony.
During cross-examination, Blanche highlighted inconsistencies in Michael Cohen’s account.
Cohen had previously testified that a call with Trump’s bodyguard, Keith Schiller, on October 24, 2016, was to discuss the Stormy Daniels payment.
However, Blanche produced a text message from Cohen to Schiller before the call, mentioning only a prank call from a teenager, not Daniels.
Blanche asserted that the brief 96-second call could not have covered both topics, challenging Cohen’s truthfulness.
This revelation poses a challenge for the prosecution, which relies heavily on Michael Cohen’s testimony.
Legal experts noted that the inconsistencies might sow reasonable doubt among jurors about Cohen’s reliability.
NYU Law professor Ryan Goodman remarked that if the trial ended immediately, Cohen’s credibility issues could hinder a conviction.
The prosecution now faces the task of rehabilitating Cohen’s testimony during redirect examination.
Trump left the courtroom buoyed by the day’s proceedings. Supported by GOP lawmakers, including Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, Trump described the day as “fascinating” and reiterated his stance that the trial was a “scam.”
This optimistic outlook contrasts with the generally difficult month Trump has faced in court.
The prosecution will have the opportunity to address the inconsistencies in Cohen’s testimony when the court reconvenes.
Despite the defense’s effective cross-examination, legal analysts point out that this is just one aspect of the broader case.
Norm Eisen, a legal analyst, emphasized that while the cross-examination was a blow, it was not necessarily a knockout punch for the prosecution.
The prosecution was aware of the risks associated with relying on Cohen, a convicted felon with a history of lying.
His credibility was always going to be a focal point for the defense. Criminal defense attorney Nikki Lotze noted that the defense’s strategy of making the trial a referendum on Cohen’s honesty could be effective, as it only takes one doubtful juror to prevent a unanimous conviction.
As the trial progresses, the defense will continue to highlight Cohen’s past dishonesty and personal stake in the case’s outcome.
The prosecution, on the other hand, will aim to mitigate the damage and reinforce the broader evidence supporting their case.
The jury is expected to begin deliberations soon, potentially around Memorial Day, with the trial’s conclusion set to coincide with the run-up to the 2024 presidential election.
Thursday’s proceedings marked a pivotal moment in Trump’s trial, with Cohen’s testimony under intense scrutiny.
The defense’s ability to cast doubt on Cohen’s credibility may influence the jury’s final decision, underscoring the high stakes for both sides in this landmark case.
Also Read: Supreme Court Protects Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Thwarts Payday Lenders’ Challenge
India has taken a significant step in advancing Hyperloop technology, an emerging mode of transportation…
Oriental Rail Infrastructure has received its first major contract to supply seats for the Vande…
The construction of the Anand Bullet Train Station in Gujarat, a key stop on the…
The space industry witnessed a series of delays this week as both the launches of…
Trump Inauguration: In what can only be described as a seismic shift from over a…
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reported numerous violations at a Taylor Farms facility…